Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Change vs. Position

Arguing for a change and arguing a position are a lot alike. The only real difference is what you are arguing about. Arguing for a change involves convincing readers to do something, or change a particular behavior. On the other hand, arguing a position is convincing the readers to beleive something, or change their viewpoint on a certain subject. In the "Declaration of Independence," Jefferson talks about freeing the country from Britain. It is such a broad topic, which is quite unlike the topic of "Life Without Health Insurance." In Clarks essay, she is talking about the personal problems many people without health insurance face. In Jeffersons essay, he includes many examples to support his opinion, just like Clark does to support her point.

1 comment:

BrittG said...

I like how you stated that in arguing for change involves convincing readers to do something, or change a particular behavior. And in arguing for a position is convincing the readers to believe something or to change their viewpoint on the subject. So, both the essays involve changing something but one is more active then the other. They both show personal experience for support in their essays to persuade their readers.